AE911Truth’s Chairman and Attorneys Discuss Path to the Supreme Court

A federal court has ruled in our case against NIST that U.S. government agencies are allowed to issue knowingly false reports, and that their reports are NOT required to be scientifically accurate.
 
 
In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by AE911Truth Chairman, Roland Angle, and the attorneys involved in the Supreme Court filing, Mick Harrison, and John M. Clifford, to delve into the details of not only the case itself but also the process ahead. And they’ll discuss the implications of this important case for the entire country. 
 
 
 
 
Our case is one that not only affects the World Trade Center issue but any issue in which science sits at the center. We are now not only fighting for 9/11 justice but for the future of the United States!
 
As we prepare to wage this important battle in the new year, we are holding our year-end fundraiser.
 
 

We need to raise $5,000 by December 31

 
This will help us garner the resources we need to carry on our historic fight.
 
 
In our pursuit of 9/11 justice, AE911Truth has stepped into an issue bigger than ALL of us.
 
This battle is one that we’re in together.
 
 

Related News

One woman’s story of academic resistance to WTC 7 evidence

Performed in Italian, Le Caverne has the potential to bring awareness of 9/11 truth to a whole new audience in a part of the world that is far from the World Trade Center destruction of September 11, 2001.
Read More...

Italian performer uses art to shine a light on 9/11

According to Gasparini: “The song denounces the social apathy towards the abuse of truth perpetrated by the state and by the empire.”
Read More...

‘Calling Out Bravo-7’: a firefighter’s perspective on Building 7

“ Calling Out Bravo-7 is the best, most detailed and most informative film to date on the collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7. A very important piece of work. ” – Tony Rooke, film producer.
Read More...

It’s the first ‘WTC 7’ search result on YouTube… but is it valid?

When you search for “WTC 7” in YouTube, the top video that comes up doesn’t question whether explosives were used to bring the building down on 9/11
Read More...

As engineers, we have a legal responsibility to guard the public’s safety.

We are a small non-profit taking on a tremendous issue, and we need your support to help fund these efforts.

If you believe in the power of dedicated people and their ability to change the world, then please make a donation right now!

Thank you so much for your continued support and your willingness to stand with us! 

 

 

From Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth and filmmaker, Dylan Avery comes this short documentary that is both hauntingly beautiful in its presentation and startlingly grim in its revelations. 


Join civil engineer, Jonathan Cole through an informational odyssey as he revisits the controversy surrounding the impossible destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th 2001, and how his research, along with the research of others, has pulled the rug out from under the conclusions offered by the federal government on why those three buildings ultimately failed. 

Through Cole's testimony, and that of mechanical engineer, Tony Szamboti, a dark picture comes into focus that demonstrates that not only is the official story of what killed so many people on America's darkest day provably false but that the federal government actively and willfully turned a blind eye to the observable facts during its unscientific investigation of the building collapses. 

In a little over twenty minutes, Thirty Seconds of Silence reveals more about the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 than the media has revealed to the public in the over twenty years since the event took place.