Our final stop on the Southwest tour brought us back into the capable hands of one of the more consistent and successful 9/11 Truth groups in the country — Colorado911Truth in Denver. The group’s dedicated leadership team of Fran Shure, Marti Hopper, and Earl Staelin worked hard and long to make this stop the most successful on the tour numbers-wise. Of the 196 attendees, four believed the official narrative of the Twin Towers' destruction before seeing the film; 21 were unsure. After the film, though, only one still believed the government's narrative and a mere three remained unsure. (There were three architects and eight engineers attending.)

Denver crowdColorado 9/11 Truth activist and event co-coordinator Earl Staelin introduced the audience to the difficult subject of the film they were about to see and discuss. Joseph Cris Mohr Denver 768A Denver 9/11 Truth activist named Joseph (right) tried to convince debunker Chris Mohr (left) that in order to believe that Building 7 could come down at free fall without explosives, you’d have to also believe that race car “A” could achieve the same acceleration as car “B” even though only car “A” had to plow through 10 other cars on the way to the finish line. His analogy shows the absurdity of WTC 7 free falling due to normal office fires, which would have had to somehow “remove” every one of the 80 columns in the building. Chris Mohr, the lone believer in the official conspiracy, was in the crowd. He has spent considerable time debating AE911Truth at various venues, including this Boulder, Colorado, debate and the online debate at ChrisMohr911.com. Gage passed along to Mohr the queries from audience members who wanted to know how supporters of the official story respond to questions posed to them by the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Hopper Shure Denver 768Marti Hopper (left) and Fran Shure, two psychologists from AE911Truth's landmark documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, answered questions about the incredible difficulty most people have accepting the evidence, which, because of its implications, threatens their world view.

For example, Mohr was asked to answer, “How could Building 7 come down at free fall for any period of time without explosives?” He theorized that if the inside of the building fell first and then dragged the exterior down with quite a “tug,” it could come down in this fashion. Gage commented that such an event would produce massive warping of the exterior perimeter structural steel system and consequent massive breaking of the granite panels and windows — none of which was seen.

The Southwest tour brought many activists together who had never met. They brainstormed numerous ideas during the lengthy and intense Q&A after each showing of the film. They were deeply moved by Erik Lawyer's personal story and appreciated his perspective on the NFPA manual for investigating fires and explosions as well as his role in exposing the 20 common myths. They now look forward to networking and developing strategies to enhance the effectiveness of their Local Action Groups.

If you feel similarly inclined and motivated after reading about this tour, please join AE911Truth as a member today and do your part!

Related News

It’s the first ‘WTC 7’ search result on YouTube… but is it valid?

When you search for “WTC 7” in YouTube, the top video that comes up doesn’t question whether explosives were used to bring the building down on 9/11
Read More...

Chapter 4 of Roland Angle’s book finally names names

We have now released the next chapter of AE911Truth Chairman, Roland Angle’s work in progress, Engineering the 9/11 Cover-Up: How the WTC Evidence was Kept Secret from the World. Today, we are releasing the fourth chapter!
Read More...

RFK Sr. suggested false flag against Cuba

Free Fall panel on RFK’s false flag idea, Trump shooting, and WTC flashes
Read More...

We deserve better

Integrity: doing the right thing when no one is watching
Read More...

Candace Owens questions the 9/11 official story

Sticking up for those who don’t believe the government’s narrative of the events.
Read More...

As engineers, we have a legal responsibility to guard the public’s safety.

We are a small non-profit taking on a tremendous issue, and we need your support to help fund these efforts.

If you believe in the power of dedicated people and their ability to change the world, then please make a donation right now!

Thank you so much for your continued support and your willingness to stand with us! 

 

 

From Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth and filmmaker, Dylan Avery comes this short documentary that is both hauntingly beautiful in its presentation and startlingly grim in its revelations. 


Join civil engineer, Jonathan Cole through an informational odyssey as he revisits the controversy surrounding the impossible destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th 2001, and how his research, along with the research of others, has pulled the rug out from under the conclusions offered by the federal government on why those three buildings ultimately failed. 

Through Cole's testimony, and that of mechanical engineer, Tony Szamboti, a dark picture comes into focus that demonstrates that not only is the official story of what killed so many people on America's darkest day provably false but that the federal government actively and willfully turned a blind eye to the observable facts during its unscientific investigation of the building collapses. 

In a little over twenty minutes, Thirty Seconds of Silence reveals more about the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 than the media has revealed to the public in the over twenty years since the event took place.